FBI Disputes Audit On Troubled Sentinel ProjectFBI Disputes Audit On Troubled Sentinel Project

The Federal Bureau of Investigation slams an inspector general's report on its long-delayed and over-budget case management system overhaul as inaccurate and based on outdated information.

J. Nicholas Hoover, Senior Editor, information Government

October 21, 2010

5 Min Read
information logo in a gray background | information

15 Budget Busting Technology Projects

15 Budget Busting Technology Projects


(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: 15 Budget Busting Technology Projects

The Federal Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday slammed a new report by its inspector general, saying that the report's continued concerns about the $450 million Sentinel case management project's ability to stay on schedule and budget were based on outdated data and didn't accurately reflect FBI management and plans for the project.

The inspector general's report expresses concerns that the Sentinel project is "delayed, over budget, and in danger of not delivering a fully functional case management system." The report notes that cost estimates have already increased from $425 million to $451 million, and that Sentinel's completion date has been pushed back repeatedly. It also expresses concerns with the FBI's management of Sentinel, and with its move toward a new agile development strategy for Sentinel's completion.

"We believe the interim report does not accurately reflect the FBI's management of the Sentinel project, and fails to credit the FBI with taking corrective action to keep it on budget," FBI associate deputy director T.J. Harrington said in a response to the report. For example, Harrington says, the report mentions neither the Department of Justice's formal approval of the new development strategy nor the reception of National Archives and Records Administration authority for the use of Sentinel to generate official FBI records.

The FBI's forceful response to an internal audit represents a relatively rare step. Typically, agencies respond to criticism by the inspector general in responses that are then integrated directly into the report. In this case, however, the FBI took the extra step of issuing a press release to try to stay ahead of the critical report, even going so far as to accuse the inspector general of failing to comply with generally accepted government accounting standards.

Regardless of the FBI's stance on the individual report, however, it's clear that Sentinel isn't where the FBI had expected it to be by now. While in August the FBI estimated it would have spent $405 million of the $451 million budgeted for the project by the end of September, it has only delivered two of Sentinel's four phases to agents and analysts. Original estimates under the $451 million budget had estimated these two phases would cost only $306 million.

The FBI is pushing on its budget limits for Sentinel even as the delivery of functionality lags behind where the FBI thought it would be by this time. Sentinel only has the ability to generate and process half of the case-related forms that the FBI had intended to deliver by the end of phase two of the project, and even these forms are still not fully automated. So, while FBI agents and analysts can use the forms, they still have to print them to obtain approval signatures and keep hard copies of the files.

In addition, Sentinel is integrated with eight other IT systems, rather than the 10 the FBI had expected by the end of phase two. Missing are hooks into a document conversion system and the FBI's financial management system. An administrative case management functionality has also been delayed.

Inside DHS' Classified Cyber-Coordination Headquarters

Inside DHS' Classified Cyber-Coordination Headquarters


(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: Inside DHS' Classified Cyber-Coordination Headquarters

"At this stage of the Sentinel project, FBI users have received far less functionality than was planned," the auditor's report says. "Sentinel largely remains a more user-friendly way to search [the old case management system] rather than the state of the art, stand-alone case management system that it was envisioned to provide by now."

The report also expresses concern about the FBI's management controls over Sentinel. For example, the report notes that the FBI limited or eliminated several project management activities designed to monitor Sentinel's progress, including: eliminating monthly project health assessments designed to provide an independent assessment of cost, schedule, and scope; and discontinuing earned value management reporting measuring cost estimates, evaluating progress, and analyzing cost and performance trends.

Largely to remedy these problems and concerns, the FBI is taking a new, agile development approach to completing Sentinel, drastically reducing its reliance on its prime contractor on the project, Lockheed Martin, along the way. It now says it can complete the project on budget and within reasonable time constraints.

However, the report notes, while the FBI CTO said the new methodology could enable the FBI to complete Sentinel within its $451 million budget, that estimate didn't include the first two years of maintenance of the system after completion, as had all previous budget estimates, and also didn't account for spending on the new government manpower that would be required of the project. In addition, the FBI didn't provide the inspector general with any new schedule estimates for completing the work.

The new approach will entail cutting Sentinel's devoted workforce by 67%, going from 220 to 40 contract workers, and from 30 to 12 government workers. It also means the FBI won't migrate data from the old case management system into Sentinel as had been assumed since the start of the project, but instead will rely on new search technology to pull the two systems closer together. The inspector general raised concerns that the decrease in manpower might make it harder to complete the system on time, and the continued existence of the old case management system could result in higher operational costs and increased complexity.

"The report expresses 'significant concern' about the FBI's new plan, yet it offers no alternative and recommends, in part, that we follow this course," Harrington said. "Two of three recommendations direct the FBI to reassess the functionality described in Sentinel's requirements and prioritize the remaining requirements to have the greatest impact on agents and analysts. This is what we have done in moving forward to complete Sentinel using agile development."

Read more about:

20102010

About the Author

J. Nicholas Hoover

Senior Editor, information Government

Never Miss a Beat: Get a snapshot of the issues affecting the IT industry straight to your inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights