Spam Blocking Is High On Everyone's Priority ListSpam Blocking Is High On Everyone's Priority List

Despite assurances from E-mail vendors that anti-spam technology is up to the task of blocking unsolicited messages

Thomas Claburn, Editor at Large, Enterprise Mobility

February 13, 2004

2 Min Read
information logo in a gray background | information

Despite assurances from E-mail vendors that anti-spam technology is up to the task of blocking unsolicited messages, such optimism discounts the determination of spammers. Compounding the problem, aggressive spam filtering runs the risk of false-positives, blocking legitimate messages by mistake. Such missing missives have the potential to do more harm by their absence than an in-box full of notices from Nigeria of some unexpected inheritance.

With spam swelling to fill available bandwidth, it isn't surprising that reducing spam ranks high as an IT priority among the 400 companies surveyed in information Research's Outlook 2004 study. Seventy percent report plans to clear corporate arteries of the noxious messages this year. Gatekeeping

The Outlook study's small, midsize, and large companies--defined by revenue of less than $100 million, $100 million to less than $1 billion, and $1 billion or above--all say spam abatement is a priority.

The means to that end is content-filtering or anti-spam software, with 65% of respondents overall eyeing this tool. On average, we found that spam accounts for 43% of inbound messages in small businesses, 37% in midsize firms, and 36% in large companies.

Of the 239 sites that track the amount of spam received in our 2003 Spam In the Enterprise survey, 86% saw spam increasing on a monthly basis. The consensus puts the rate of increase at 37% a month. The good news is that half of this spam gets caught before it reaches desktops.

What's preventing spam from reaching your company's users? Share your tech strategies at the address below.

Thomas Claburn
Associate Editor
[email protected]

Filtering Over TimeFiltering Over Time

Is your IT division implementing and supporting content-filtering or anti-spam software?

The more painful a problem, the more attention it attracts. Spam grabbed the efforts and resources of IT groups incrementally throughout 2003. Ferris Research estimates that spam costs U.S. businesses $8.9 billion a year in lost productivity and costs for preventive tools and services. information Research's Priorities study found that content-filtering and anti-spam software use rose steadily each quarter.

Read more about:

20042004

About the Author

Thomas Claburn

Editor at Large, Enterprise Mobility

Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, information, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful master's degree in film production. He wrote the original treatment for 3DO's Killing Time, a short story that appeared in On Spec, and the screenplay for an independent film called The Hanged Man, which he would later direct. He's the author of a science fiction novel, Reflecting Fires, and a sadly neglected blog, Lot 49. His iPhone game, Blocfall, is available through the iTunes App Store. His wife is a talented jazz singer; he does not sing, which is for the best.

Never Miss a Beat: Get a snapshot of the issues affecting the IT industry straight to your inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights