Don't 'Sell Open Source' - Sell BrainpowerDon't 'Sell Open Source' - Sell Brainpower

The big question many people ask themselves about open source is: "How do we monetize this?" The real question should be: "What are we really selling?" Answer: Brainpower.

The always-interesting Matt Asay put it this way:

As someone else once put it, open source is useful if your primary product is not software itself. A company whose main product is consultancy or support staffing (IBM) can make more direct use of open source as an attractor than a company that makes software itself as their main offering (Microsoft or Adobe). The more I talk with people in and around this industry, the more I think there's a case to be made for both approaches. The hard part is convincing people on both sides that the other guy is not always wrong.

It's the word scarcity that sets some people off, I think. It's one of those words, like proprietary, that's become loaded with unexpected emotional weight -- probably because scarcity usually comes with the word artificial prepended to it.

The problem, of course, is that not all scarcity -- no, not even in IT and computing -- is artificial. Intelligent people who create great things when in the same room together are in short supply. Google's PageRank algorithm could easily be made public, but the collective expertise of the company is irreplaceable. The same could and has been said about open source -- about the MySQL dev team, for instance: the people are the most valuable resource, not the app.

There's a formula for you: Use open source to attract customers to your collective expertise. Software is cheap, sometimes even free. But brains are priceless.

Read information's first-ever analysis of top CIOs in federal, state, and local government, and how they're embracing new expectations. Download the report here (registration required).

Follow me and the rest of information on Twitter.