Mainframes And Your Total Enterprise Virtualization StrategyMainframes And Your Total Enterprise Virtualization Strategy

Our information Analytics Informed CIO series arms business technology chiefs with the questions they must ask before dropping big bucks. In this installment, we examine what part today's mainframes, and the professionals who manage them, play in developing an enterprise-wide unified virtualization strategy.

Michael Healey, Senior Contributing Editor

July 30, 2009

2 Min Read
information logo in a gray background | information

information Green - August 3, 2009 information Green Download the entire August 3 issue of information, distributed in an all-digital format as part of our Green Initiative
(Registration required.)
We will plant a tree
for each of the first 5,000 downloads.


In our information Analytics "ð" report, available at at our information Analytics Research Community, Michael Healey examines the part today's mainframes, and the professionals who manage them, play in developing an enterprise-wide converged virtualization strategy.

Q: How can we most effectively address organizational issues?

A: Mainframe and X86 teams must agree on SLAs and decide who has rights for budgeting, provisioning, and security decisions. This is the biggest challenge when developing a unified virtualization strategy.

Q: What's our long-term OS outlook?

A: The core OS to focus on for mainframe virtualization is Linux, with Novell SUSE and Red Hat leading the pack. Linux has a nine-year track record on big iron and multiple options for deployment. I/O volume and integration between Linux and legacy mainframe apps are the two main considerations.

Q: What are realistic uptime requirements and options?

A: Enterprises look to mainframes for reliability. However, be aware that the ability to migrate virtual machines among hosts as conditions dictate or in the event of a failure isn't in z/VM; IBM touts the reliability stats of the mainframe as a reason for leaving this out.

Q: What tools are we going to use for monitoring and management?

A: Unfortunately, there's no single set of tools to cover both platforms or create the fabled single pane of glass. IT must carefully design a plan that combines tools from both platforms as part of a tight operational runbook.

Q: Do we need a training plan?

A: Yes. CA issued a survey last year that reported 72% of organizations have mainframe pros eligible for retirement. So how hard is it to migrate and retrain staff? We'd equate it to moving from Novell NetWare to Microsoft Active Directory.

Return to the story:
Two Tribes, One Future: Bringing Mainframes Into the IT Mainstream

Read more about:

20092009

About the Author

Michael Healey

Senior Contributing Editor

Mike Healey is the president of Yeoman Technology Group, an engineering and research firm focusing on maximizing technology investments for organizations, and an information contributor. He has more than 25 years of experience in technology integration and business development. Prior to founding Yeoman, Mike served as the CTO of national network integrator GreenPages. He joined GreenPages as part of the acquisition of TENCorp, where he served as president for 14 years. He has a BA in operations management from the University of Massachusetts Amherst and an MBA from Babson College. He is a regular contributor for information, focusing on the business challenges related to implementing technology, focusing on the impact of Internet- and cloud-centric technology.

Never Miss a Beat: Get a snapshot of the issues affecting the IT industry straight to your inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights